About
On June 16, 2022, President Joseph R. Biden signed into law the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022 (OSRA), enacted as Public Law 117-146 [PDF, 219 KB]. This webpage catalogs Commission actions taken to comply with requirements established by the enacted legislation. It will be updated regularly.
OSRA Rulemaking Activity
Final Rule
Industry Advisories
- Industry Advisory – Requirement to File Timely and Accurate Service Contracts
Posted: June 2, 2023 - Industry Advisory — Interim Procedures for Submitting “Charge Complaints” Under 46 U.S.C. § 41310
Posted: July 14, 2022 - Industry Advisory — Demurrage and Detention Billing Practices
Posted: July 22, 2022 - Industry Advisory — Applicability of Provisions Contained in PL 117-146
Posted: June 24, 2022
Charge Complaints
Reports
- Study on Best Practices of Chassis Pools (National Academies)
This report is published pursuant to section 19 of the Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022. The report was produced by the Transportation Research Board of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. It is not a work product of the Federal Maritime Commission. - Fact Finding 29 Final Report
- Containerized Freight Statistics
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Can I file a Charge Complaint within a Formal Proceeding under 46 CFR § 502.61 or Small Claims (formal or informal) Proceeding under 46 CFR § 502.301-321?
No. Charge Complaints are a separate process from Formal or Small Claims complaints.
Charge complaint filers can choose to separately submit a Formal or Small Claims complaint, or provide information to the Commission’s Bureau of Enforcement, Investigation, and Compliance in support of a Commission investigation, but these distinct processes cannot be combined into a single submission.
You can also seek alternative dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services.
More information on the Charge Complaint Process can be found in Guidance on Charge Complaint Interim Procedures.
If a demurrage and detention invoice/bill does not meet OSRA’s requirements, does that permanently eliminate responsibility to pay the charges on that non-conforming invoice?
No. Issuing an invoice/bill that does not comply with OSRA’s requirements does not permanently eliminate the invoice recipient’s (invoiced/billed party’s) obligation to pay those charges.
46 U.S.C. § 41104(f) cancels the obligation to pay an invoice/bill that does not conform to OSRA but does not prevent the carrier from reissuing the charges on an invoice/bill that does meet OSRA requirements. A charged party does have an obligation to pay charges billed via a compliant invoice.
Does OSRA have a phase-in period? Can the public wait for further Commission guidance or rulemakings before complying?
No. OSRA included no phase-in periods, with a few limited exceptions. OSRA requirements became effective when enacted on June 16, 2022. The Commission addressed this question in Industry Advisories posted here on June 24, 2022 and July 22, 2022 (See Industry Advisories Section above).
The Commission is engaged in several rulemakings necessary to implement OSRA. Pending or future rulemakings do not defer the obligation to comply with OSRA requirements that are already in effect.
Is the Commission planning to issue rulemakings regarding OSRA? Where can I look for guidance?
Rulemakings are underway to implement OSRA. Detailed instructions on how to submit comments, including instructions on how to request confidential treatment, who to contact for further information, and any additional information on the rulemaking process is described in the respective rulemaking documents when they are issued.
The Commission has transitioned to the Federal eRulemaking Portal at regulations.gov to provide a central location for public notice and opportunity for comment on its rulemaking proceedings.
Information on current rulemaking projects is posted on this page or can be viewed on the Commission’s reginfo.gov page.
Do invoices/bills issued to non-U.S. entities need to comply with OSRA’s invoice/billing requirements? What if they are issued by a non-U.S. entity?
Yes. The requirements are applicable to common carriers as defined at 46 U.S.C. § 40102(7). The Commission does not determine if a common carrier meets that definition based on if its customers are based in the U.S. Instead, the Commission makes its determination based on whether a common carrier holds itself out to provide transportation between the U.S. and a foreign country and uses, for all or part of the transportation, a vessel operating between a U.S. port and a foreign port.
If an entity is acting as a common carrier as defined under the Shipping Act, then the common carrier’s invoices/bills for charges to both U.S. and non-U.S. entities are subject to the law. The common carrier must also comply with the invoice/billing requirements of 46 U.S.C. § 41104(d) for demurrage and detention charges. This holds true regardless of whether the invoices/bills are issued in the United States or abroad, whether they are issued to a U.S. entity or a foreign entity, and whether they are issued by a U.S. common carrier or non-U.S. common carrier.
Where can I learn more about the rulemaking process?
An abbreviated explanation of the rulemaking process can be found on Regulations.gov. A more expansive reference, that includes Frequently Asked Questions and a “Reg Map” document detailing each step of the rulemaking process, is available on Reginfo.gov.
Related News
-
Commissioner Sola Provides Briefing on Fact Finding 30 to Senior DoT Official
COVID-19 related impacts on ocean shipping and the cruise industry were discussed Wednesday in a conference call that brought together two Commissioners of the Federal Maritime Commission, a senior official from the Department of Transportation,…
Categories: News Articles
-
Commissioner Sola Proposes Changes to FMC Regulations on Cruise Line Performance and Refunds
Updated 8/10/20 to provide details on the proposed changes to passenger refunds for canceled bookings. Commissioner Louis E. Sola has proposed the Federal Maritime Commission initiate a rulemaking to amend its regulations governing Passenger Vessel Operators…
Categories: News Articles
-
FMC Provides Regulatory Flexibility to Small Passenger Vessel Operators
The Federal Maritime Commission voted to support a proposal put forward by Fact Finding Officer Commissioner Louis E. Sola that provides limited and temporary relief to small passenger vessel operators whose operations and business have been disrupted…
Categories: News Articles
-
Dye Covid-19 Supply Chain Investigation Shifts Focus to NY/NJ in Phase Two
Commissioner Rebecca Dye’s Fact Finding investigation of COVID-19 related impacts to the supply chain (Fact Finding 29) is entering Phase Two with a concentration on issues related to operations at the Port Authority of New…
Categories: News Articles
-
Fact Finding 30 Innovation Teams Examining Financial Responsibility Requirements
Cruise lines, marine terminal operators, and port authorities participating on Innovation Teams established by Commissioner Louis Sola as part of his Fact Finding 30 investigation are taking positive steps to address the sufficiency of agency administered financial…
Categories: News Articles
-
Commissioner Sola Reports on meeting with ILWU Leadership in Fact Finding 30 to Discuss Impacts of COVID-19 on Longshore Workforce
Earlier this week I had an excellent discussion with the senior leadership of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU) concerning the impact of the current pandemic on the financial wellbeing of their members. International…
Categories: News Articles
-
Fact Finding 30 Phase 1 Report Identifies Proposal That Would Help U.S. Cruise Companies
An Initial Report issued today by Commissioner Louis Sola identifies a regulatory step that addresses a critical COVID-19 fiscal impact experienced by the cruise industry generally, but most significantly by small passenger vessel operators that are largely…
Categories: News Articles
-
Commissioner Dye Announces Findings of San Pedro Bay Discussions – June 17, 2020
Following conversations with the port directors in Los Angeles and Long Beach, ocean carrier chief executive officers, Southern California marine terminal operators, longshore labor leaders, and FMC Innovation Teams, Commissioner Rebecca Dye has identified approaches…
Categories: News Articles
-
Commission Advisory for Cruise Passengers June 17, 2020
The Federal Maritime Commission is aware passenger cruise lines have canceled or postponed numerous voyages, chiefly attributable to a “No Sail Order” issued by the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) as well as…
Categories: News Articles
-
Fact Finding 30 Investigation Focusing on Cruise Line Financial Responsibility and Refund Policies
Examining issues related to how cruise lines meet financial responsibility requirements and the lines’ policies related to ticket refunds are becoming the key focal points of the Fact Finding 30 Investigation “COVID-19 Impact on the Cruise Industry”…
Categories: News Articles

